![]()
on January 8, 2026, 11:54:00, in reply to "Banning outright, yes, but the imposition of an income tax of 80% on"
As for the AirBnBs....you are correct again. That is proably another 5+% of our single family housing stock that is tied up....especially in tourist locations. That is absolutely a fixable issue for the local municipalities...just limit the number of licenses to do so and charge an exorbitant city tax to make it not worthwhile.
Previous Message
SFH ownership when you hit a threshold is completely constitutional. You hammer this through the tax code, disallowance of interest deductions and a surtax above a threshold is totally fine and would stop the practice instantly. I don't think that a handful of companies are responsible for this issue, though, I think the aspiring Mini Trumps with 6 rentals and 5 AirBNBs are far more culpable than Blackstone.
I don't think the Feds really should be doing much on this issue. Where it should be addressed is locally where it is a problem. They need to raise the local property taxes on non-owner occupied homes to the point where the business doesn't cash flow.
Previous Message
Previous Message
We are supposed to be pro-market here. Is there a monopoly situation or illegal practice going on that could already be enforced?
So many places it’s dummies in government overregulating housing and taking forever for costly approvals.
Previous Message
Put an ownership cap of 20 single family homes or less by any corporation and housing pricing for entry level homes gets 5-10% more affordable overnight.
probably just another real jerk in life![]()
39