Because it only follows that anyone that would take issue with seeing someone's underwear because of saggy pants would have an issue with nudity. If I'm wrong, I apologize.
I didn't call you a prude. I merely stated that my mom, even though a very religious Christian, was no prude. Why would you assume I'm calling you a prude just by making that statement?
I don't understand you. You assume things and then respond before asking for clarification. If you thought I was calling you a prude (or feel I've slandered you) why not ask FIRST...then we can work on it.
Look, if I hurt you're feelings I truly apologize for that...it's not my intention to hurt ANYONE'S feelings. But, I must admit, that last statement looks a little sarcastic and accusative. So, I don't know...are you sincere that your feelings are hurt? Sometimes I think you're very bullheaded and arguementive...but then maybe I seem that way to you. I can tell you that I AM sincere in my apologies. That said, I read a comment (not necessarily yours) and I respond. I say what's on my mind, and my intent is not to cause hurt feelings, but if I do the offended should ask about it before making a come back. If someone has issue with it I welcome a rebuttal, because I sure ain't perfect and sometimes my wording may not be too swift. Can't we all just get along?