Re: School Board Elections/Candidates Archived Message
Posted by Actively Concerned on January 2, 2011, 2:18 am, in reply to "Re: School Board Elections/Candidates"
Agreed. I'm simply saying that leading this district should no longer be considered a reason for election since it's been run into the ground in recent years. A homework assignment for all voters: look at the last names of those running this year and then go to the library and look at the last names of those who ran 20, 30, and 40 years prior. Not much of a difference. Will fresh blood be a panacea? Unlikely. But I'm willing to give it a shot.
|
Message Thread: | This response ↓
- School Board Elections/Candidates - The Optimist December 30, 2010, 9:03 am
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - opinionated December 30, 2010, 12:59 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - The Optimist December 30, 2010, 8:23 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - machine December 30, 2010, 11:07 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - Actively Concerned January 1, 2011, 5:01 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - Actively Concerned January 11, 2011, 6:06 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - operator January 12, 2011, 1:05 pm
- Re: School Board Elections/Candidates - Jo592 January 12, 2011, 3:04 pm
|
|