Posted by Wyld_Roze on July 27, 2011, 11:40 pm, in reply to "Re: Second Look"
Well, first, I was talking about more the idea than the article. I agree that calling kids brats and comparing them to second hand smoke is ridiculous.
Second, I wasn't trying to say that an adult would want to spend time at a place geared towards kids. I'm just saying they exist. I might turn it around and say why would a family want to spend time at a place geared towards adults only?
It is for comfort, but so are fast food places, remote controls, automatic transmissions, heck even regular restaurants. Not everything has to be geared for a need. There are plenty of options for family-friendly places. However, besides casinos or bars, what other places are geared towards couples or adults without kids, or even parents who are on date night as a break away from their kids?
I'm saying it doesn't have to be either-or, why can't there be both. I don't understand why anybody would be upset at a place that gears towards kids, or a place that gears towards adults. It's a concept that's targeting a growing market. It's an additional option for those who choose it. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not discriminating towards anybody, it's just an added choice for people.
on July 27, 2011, 11:40 pm, in reply to "