Because there are already ways to lose your citizenship, the concept exists
|
Federal statutes describe ways to lose it. Congress can always add more and no doubt some of them would be challenged. I think Congress has considerable leeway here, as long as due process is involved and there is no risk to people born here to American citizens and have lived here the entire time without some crime that involved foreign loyalty (treason is already a way to lose citizenship).
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 SCOTUS strikes down “conversion therapy” bans 8-1 - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:16:00
- my God - AceFrehley April 2, 2026, 19:18:12
- How did the birthright citizenship hearing go? Upon reflection if “subject to the jurisdiction - groupguy April 1, 2026, 14:58:22
- I think future Court might allow expanded rules for LOSING your citizenship - Potomac April 3, 2026, 6:13:26
- Explained to someone why Barron Trump is not a beneficiary of birthright citizenship - Potomac April 2, 2026, 19:08:01
- Court could decide to invalidate Trump's EO and duck the main issue - Potomac April 2, 2026, 6:59:12
- Trump gets 2 votes at most is my prediction* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 17:57:59
- dots - Lexillini April 1, 2026, 16:21:57
- Advisory Opinions already has a podcast on the oral arguments* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:50:31
- the constitutional argument for changing it is not strong; this is not a policy question - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:48:09
- it doesn't apply to people here randomly; it's about their offspring - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:16:48
- Other two liberals in concurrence (quote) - Potomac March 31, 2026, 20:45:44
- Here’s an example of overreach by Colorado’s law - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:26:10
- As soon as I saw it was an 8-1 decision, I knew who the lone dissenter was. - Lexillini March 31, 2026, 10:21:00
« Back to index | View thread » |
on April 3, 2026, 8:57:49, in reply to "Kinda this. If nothing else, Trump has started the conversation. "