As I was looking up the names just yesterday: "per curiam". Unsigned.
|
From AI:
Visibility of Votes: While the author is hidden, the votes of the justices (who dissented or concurred) are often still listed, notes Florida Courts.
Often signed, but maybe this time they leave them off??
Strictly MHO, but I simply can't see them overturning this. Some fun arguments, etc. but at the end of the day nothing will change re: the underlying substance.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 SCOTUS strikes down “conversion therapy” bans 8-1 - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:16:00
- my God - AceFrehley April 2, 2026, 19:18:12
- How did the birthright citizenship hearing go? Upon reflection if “subject to the jurisdiction - groupguy April 1, 2026, 14:58:22
- I think future Court might allow expanded rules for LOSING your citizenship - Potomac April 3, 2026, 6:13:26
- Explained to someone why Barron Trump is not a beneficiary of birthright citizenship - Potomac April 2, 2026, 19:08:01
- Court could decide to invalidate Trump's EO and duck the main issue - Potomac April 2, 2026, 6:59:12
- Trump gets 2 votes at most is my prediction* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 17:57:59
- As I was looking up the names just yesterday: "per curiam". Unsigned. - osklister April 2, 2026, 8:53:09
- dots - Lexillini April 1, 2026, 16:21:57
- Advisory Opinions already has a podcast on the oral arguments* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:50:31
- the constitutional argument for changing it is not strong; this is not a policy question - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:48:09
- it doesn't apply to people here randomly; it's about their offspring - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:16:48
- Other two liberals in concurrence (quote) - Potomac March 31, 2026, 20:45:44
- Here’s an example of overreach by Colorado’s law - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:26:10
- As soon as I saw it was an 8-1 decision, I knew who the lone dissenter was. - Lexillini March 31, 2026, 10:21:00
« Back to index | View thread » |
on April 2, 2026, 8:53:09, in reply to "Trump gets 2 votes at most is my prediction*"