the constitutional argument for changing it is not strong; this is not a policy question
|
We would be dumb to have this policy if starting from scratch. But we aren't.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
SCOTUS strikes down “conversion therapy” bans 8-1 - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:16:00
- my God - AceFrehley April 2, 2026, 19:18:12
- How did the birthright citizenship hearing go? Upon reflection if “subject to the jurisdiction - groupguy April 1, 2026, 14:58:22
- I think future Court might allow expanded rules for LOSING your citizenship - Potomac April 3, 2026, 6:13:26
- Explained to someone why Barron Trump is not a beneficiary of birthright citizenship - Potomac April 2, 2026, 19:08:01
- Court could decide to invalidate Trump's EO and duck the main issue - Potomac April 2, 2026, 6:59:12
- Trump gets 2 votes at most is my prediction* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 17:57:59
- dots - Lexillini April 1, 2026, 16:21:57
- Advisory Opinions already has a podcast on the oral arguments* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:50:31
- the constitutional argument for changing it is not strong; this is not a policy question - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:48:09
- it doesn't apply to people here randomly; it's about their offspring - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:16:48
- Other two liberals in concurrence (quote) - Potomac March 31, 2026, 20:45:44
- Here’s an example of overreach by Colorado’s law - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:26:10
- As soon as I saw it was an 8-1 decision, I knew who the lone dissenter was. - Lexillini March 31, 2026, 10:21:00
 « Back to index | View thread » |