How did the birthright citizenship hearing go? Upon reflection if “subject to the jurisdiction
thereof” just means you’re under our rules because you’re in our country, it’s redundant because duh you were born here so of course you’re in the country. So why add it unless citizens of other countries aren’t subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Are they? Or can they just move out or ask to be deported?  Previous Message
Not a particularly difficult case legally, IMO. Jackson with a dissent. She believes states can restrict what therapists can say.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 SCOTUS strikes down “conversion therapy” bans 8-1 - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:16:00
- my God - AceFrehley April 2, 2026, 19:18:12
- How did the birthright citizenship hearing go? Upon reflection if “subject to the jurisdiction - groupguy April 1, 2026, 14:58:22
- I think future Court might allow expanded rules for LOSING your citizenship - Potomac April 3, 2026, 6:13:26
- Explained to someone why Barron Trump is not a beneficiary of birthright citizenship - Potomac April 2, 2026, 19:08:01
- Court could decide to invalidate Trump's EO and duck the main issue - Potomac April 2, 2026, 6:59:12
- Trump gets 2 votes at most is my prediction* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 17:57:59
- dots - Lexillini April 1, 2026, 16:21:57
- Advisory Opinions already has a podcast on the oral arguments* - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:50:31
- the constitutional argument for changing it is not strong; this is not a policy question - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:48:09
- it doesn't apply to people here randomly; it's about their offspring - Potomac April 1, 2026, 15:16:48
- Other two liberals in concurrence (quote) - Potomac March 31, 2026, 20:45:44
- Here’s an example of overreach by Colorado’s law - Potomac March 31, 2026, 10:26:10
- As soon as I saw it was an 8-1 decision, I knew who the lone dissenter was. - Lexillini March 31, 2026, 10:21:00
« Back to index | View thread » |
on April 1, 2026, 14:58:22, in reply to "SCOTUS strikes down “conversion therapy” bans 8-1"