deuce-ish: I know, right? Terrible.

SCOTUS levels playing field for reverse discrimination lawsuits - Potomac June 6, 2025, 6:55:08

I can't fucking believe this. Honestly I can't. It's liberal dogma that - AceFrehley June 6, 2025, 12:52:48
- It’s really interesting that this is 9-0 because there are some uber-liberal… - DouchieHowser June 6, 2025, 14:37:26
- This decision deals a serious blow to intersectionality and the belief that there is . . . - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 13:12:42
  - EXACTLY! - AceFrehley June 6, 2025, 13:21:17
    - You shouldn't call Kagan a moron - Potomac June 6, 2025, 13:25:46
      - "the most talented of the liberal justices" is kind of a tallest midget contest, no? - osklister June 6, 2025, 15:07:23
      - Fine. Whatever. Unqualified. How's that?* - AceFrehley June 6, 2025, 13:53:08
        
        I think you undermine your arguments with such dismissive statements - Potomac June 6, 2025, 14:12:48
        
        Hold up. Are you kidding? You can argue the merits of her career in law before SCOTUS - AceFrehley June 6, 2025, 14:18:54
        
        Of course I know her career and that of all the justices* - Potomac June 6, 2025, 15:13:04
        
        OH NO YOU DI'N'T. She is qualified. This is not Harriet Miers, who only had 30 years at Locke Lord* - fratstud June 6, 2025, 14:28:38
        
        I like my judges who will sit at the top of the judging pyramid to - AceFrehley June 6, 2025, 14:33:51
        
        I don't feel as though it is necessary for Supreme Court justices to have ever been . . . - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 15:20:03
        
        For fun: Earl Warren, William Rehnquist: both had SCOTUS "era's" named after them. - osklister June 7, 2025, 14:48:34
        
        Hard disagree. You would be ten thousand times happier with me, auto or Lex on - fratstud June 6, 2025, 14:47:34
- there may be more unanimous decisions and mixed votes that you and many others think - Potomac June 6, 2025, 13:11:54
  - Neither here nor there but I have it in the back of my mind that RBG . . . - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 13:15:22
    - yes, that's how she really made her name - Potomac June 6, 2025, 13:23:28
      - Before we needed a biologist to determine someone's gender, it actually made sense - fratstud June 6, 2025, 14:35:11
Two 9-0 decisions: now there's something you don't see every day Chauncy... - osklister June 6, 2025, 9:38:03
- For those who missed it, I assume you are talking about Wisconsin and the Catholics - Potomac June 6, 2025, 9:49:55
  - Key words: 'The dispute began nearly a decade ago..." - osklister June 6, 2025, 13:28:45
  - That Wisconsin case is kind of interesting. - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 10:03:27
    - I get that you have to be vigilant about fighting requests for exemptions and - fratstud June 6, 2025, 12:00:00
      - the legal history is pretty simple - directly from Wisconsin - Potomac June 6, 2025, 12:22:25
        
        Not the legal history, I want to know the FULL and UNABRIDGED story of the case - fratstud June 6, 2025, 14:09:00
      - It's an odd hill to die on. But this linked article perhaps suggests who might have . . . - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 12:19:13
        
        Those people likely didn't get involved until this thing got to the - fratstud June 6, 2025, 14:16:22
        
        I don't know to what extent these people whisper in the ears of the state decision makers. - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 15:23:43
        
        "if these religious extremists succeed...." - yikes * - Potomac June 6, 2025, 12:25:38
        
        I know, right? Terrible. - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 12:31:20
    - that's right - Potomac June 6, 2025, 11:58:05
We need to jettison the term "reverse discrimination". There is no such thing. - Lexillini June 6, 2025, 9:27:13
- Correct. Discrimination against cis het whites is literally impossible. By definition* - fratstud June 6, 2025, 9:40:23
Bad decision. It's literally impossible for cis het whites to be discriminated against* - fratstud June 6, 2025, 8:47:02

« Back to index | View thread »