on June 6, 2026, 16:28:42, in reply to "Texas Tech denied in its distasteful effort to retain gambling QB"
he left for a bigger bag at texas tech. supposedly was 5-7M iirc. so, he was obligated to pay Cincinnati the 1M. he hadnt' done so, claiming he thought the tech collective was going to pay it (their position was he was to pay it out of the difference).
so, Cincinnati was pursuing a judgment against him. his attorney was essentially arguing that the deal was invalid under state law because it was pay for play.
so anyway, with his deal at tech likely voided by its terms (less any bonus on signing), does he go from potentially earning 7M to now owing 1M? 
Previous Message
I realize colleges are now mostly shameless in pursuit of money and success. But TT's effort to keep the QB who has admitted that he repeatedly gambled on sports, including football, is absurd.
Tech should have kicked him off the team and left it at that.
I suppose it's a bit hard for greedy schools and networks to say no, considering I get pop-up ads for gambling on prop bets while watching games.
And of course it's funny how the loss of the QB changes the betting line on TT's chances to win its league.
56
