The L.C. Smith Collectors Association
[
Message Archive
|
The L.C. Smith Collectors Association
]
other pictures
Archived Message
Posted by David Williamson on January 25, 2017, 3:01 pm, in reply to "
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
"
I forgot to add the picture of the weight in the stock and of the butt plate.
For those that do not know, the picture of the stock showing the two rectangular slots are where the stock was attached to the duplicator.
Message Thread:
20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
michael ackerman
January 3, 2017, 3:14 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
bill
January 3, 2017, 7:02 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Mike Ackerman
January 3, 2017, 8:29 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Norman Growden
January 3, 2017, 8:33 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Michael Ackerman
January 4, 2017, 4:36 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Tom Martin
January 3, 2017, 9:20 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Michael Ackerman
January 4, 2017, 4:46 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
John Liles
January 4, 2017, 5:03 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Michael Harris
January 4, 2017, 9:15 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
michael ackerman
January 25, 2017, 6:32 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
John Liles
January 25, 2017, 6:48 pm
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
Jim Cantwell
January 26, 2017, 8:15 am
Re: 20 gauge 3e single quail on both sides - "history"?
-
michael ackerman
February 8, 2017, 9:12 am
Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
H. McMurchy
January 4, 2017, 10:35 am
Quality 3
-
David Williamson
January 4, 2017, 11:08 am
Re: Quality 3
-
Tom Garver
January 4, 2017, 8:34 pm
Re: Quality 3
-
David Williamson
January 4, 2017, 8:56 pm
Re: Quality 3
-
michael ackerman
January 25, 2017, 9:31 am
Re: Quality 3
-
John Liles
January 6, 2017, 5:48 pm
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
Michael Harris
January 4, 2017, 1:14 pm
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
H. McMurchy
January 4, 2017, 1:48 pm
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
michael ackerman
January 25, 2017, 9:26 am
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
Dick Miller
January 25, 2017, 1:04 pm
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
Tom Archer
January 25, 2017, 2:42 pm
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
michael ackerman
February 8, 2017, 9:05 am
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
David Williamson
January 25, 2017, 2:51 pm
other pictures
-
David Williamson
January 25, 2017, 3:01 pm
Re: other pictures
-
Tom Archer
January 26, 2017, 11:07 am
Re: Quality No. 2 vs. No. 3
-
michael ackerman
February 8, 2017, 9:00 am
Closing this thread
-
Jim Stubbendieck
February 8, 2017, 10:38 am
Searching