Re: Quinn signs "Gay Civil Union" farce Archived Message
Posted by machine on February 2, 2011, 1:35 am, in reply to "Re: Quinn signs "Gay Civil Union" farce "
Perhaps legalizing civil unions was something that would help the people who need it - and would at least make moderates happy that it is a Civil Union but not called marriage And the Radical Right, well they wouldn't be happy with any of it. Marriage is a religious practice. Thereby; The government ought not be involved in "marriage" at all, but rather only to allow for any two people to enter into a civil union, with all of the same a rights that a "straight marriage" has now. You get you "Civil Union" at the court house, You get "married" by a pastor.
|
|