Hi Martin.

Could I suggest that you read your post again....



I don't mean to be rude Martin, but you have been posting on UKAT for a while now. Surely you must realise that the your post falls way short of what is expected.

You get back what you put in you know!

Is it too much to ask that members could at least read their posts before they commit. I know that non of us are "shakespear" in the making, but it doesn't take a minute to check your words, to make sure that they make sense.

It's not just the words though Martin. What about the actual DTC & definition? I don't know about others, but I don't know from your post, if we are discussing a DI or TDCI system. I am not about to go looking at Autodata for clarity.

What about the checks that have been performed? Is UKAT the first port of call on the diagnostic path?

If you want help, then help yourself & make the effort.

This post is not just aimed at you Martin!