AI Overview:
"The US Navy should prioritize using domestically produced steel in its shipbuilding programs to bolster the domestic steel industry and ensure national security, addressing concerns about reliance on foreign suppliers and potential supply chain disruptions.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
National Security Concerns:
Relying heavily on foreign steel for shipbuilding creates vulnerabilities, especially in times of geopolitical instability or conflict. By ensuring a domestic steel supply chain, the US Navy can maintain control over its shipbuilding capabilities and reduce dependence on potentially unreliable foreign sources.
Economic Benefits:
Supporting the domestic steel industry through shipbuilding contracts creates jobs and stimulates economic activity in the US. This can help revitalize the American steel industry and ensure its long-term viability.
Supply Chain Resilience:
The US shipbuilding industry has faced challenges in meeting the Navy's needs, including workforce shortages and delays in construction. By prioritizing domestic steel, the Navy can help ensure a more reliable and resilient supply chain, reducing the risk of project delays and cost overruns.
Current Actions:
The Biden-Harris administration is taking steps to support American steel manufacturing and shipbuilding, including considering tripling the existing 301 tariff rate on Chinese steel and aluminum.
Historical Context:
The US Navy has a history of using steel in its shipbuilding, with the "ABCD ships" of the late 1800s being a key example of the transition to steel warships.
Modern Challenges:
The Navy's aging fleet and the need to build new ships face challenges, including inadequate funding, industry capacity issues, and workforce shortages.
Future Focus:
The Navy is investing in its public shipyard infrastructure and exploring new manufacturing technologies to improve efficiency and capacity.
Industry Partnerships:
The Navy is working with industry partners to strengthen the shipbuilding industrial base and address supply chain challenges.
Examples of Navy Shipbuilders:
Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) is the largest military shipbuilding company in the United States. Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of HII, is a major supplier of US Navy surface combatants."
Previous Message
Certainly in Federal dollar infrastructure projects there is Buy American regarding steel and/or AIS requirement. Previous Message
You do enjoy yelling, "THEATRE!" at a crowded fire. And when you do this nonsense, I have the opportunity to go off and read things, time permitting, which--being self employed--is usually "often enough." Having done some of that, I can tell you that we import only about 1/3 of our steel. Aluminum is another story. None of which has any bearing at all on the difficulties the Navy is having producing ships on schedule. They would fail at that even without the tariffs. So, you are basically connecting dots that don't have any association, purely for your own political fetishes. The fact that you have some freakish obsession with the man has me wondering about your mental well being, but also provides a measure of entertainment value to the more detached portions of my nature. There is a strange fascination to watching someone go over the edge. Indeed...theatre at a crowded fire. Previous Message
THEnaval aquisition chief says US shipbuilding is around 4 years behind schedule, and over priced ,in responce rump says we must buid very fast very soon and to cut costs,
so he applies tarifs of 25% or is it 50% or ???? to steel and aluminium imports,
and this despite a $6 billion investment in shipbuilding since 2014 and another $12 billion promised in next 4 years.whicch nobody knows where it has gone and if it has helped, perhaps a job for musk that could do some good, even if it is a sudden ship X shipard