[ Message Archive | GraniteCityGossip ]

    Re: Kristy Archived Message

    Posted by Kristy on January 19, 2016, 12:16 am, in reply to "Re: Kristy"

    I have no beef with Kathy Hagnauer in particular, you are now manufacturing garbage filled with lies in an attempt to pull as many into your camp as possible.

    There is a method to your madness, you do realize that don't you? Of course you do.

    "But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention."

    "It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success."

    The points you have chosen to beat into everyone's brain is that I am someone named Katie Ronk-Meyer, that I am a liar, I have no credibility, and that eventually you will silence me.

    Prove me correct; continue with your mantra.

    Anything to divert attention from the true issues at hand.

    I never said elementary grade children were on buses with these criminals in the video. I did ask how would anyone like it if they were, because at this point the district has no clue how or what the bus situation will be. None.

    When this video was first exposed, half of the viewers believed it to be at the high school, the other half at Coolidge. Had it been at Coolidge, yes, then you would have had fifth grade students on buses with eighth grade students. I should probably call it Coolidge Attendance Center. Mentally and physically, fifth grade students are not comparable with eight grade students. My opinion, but I'm sure you'll set me straight.

    And yes, I do have a beef with the school board and their deliberate secrecy on this. There is no need for secrecy unless you are trying to hide something.

    I said it before and I'll say it again, the board intentionally avoided smart questions from concerned parents and gave pat, rehearsed, vague answers about this proposal. Everyone knows their minds were made up long before the school board meeting.

    Instead of any feasible plan, with supporting documentation as to how and how much money will be saved by going to this model, we get this from our esteemed Superintendent (see next post).

    And this pathetic explanation was penned only after the outcry from so many parents and taxpayers. Does our Superintendent insult our intelligence to think this would suffice? Or is this the best he can do? Either way, it's very telling.

    Message Thread: