Posted by Opie2 on October 28, 2015, 1:25 pm, in reply to "Re: Benghazi Hearing"
FACT: There Is No Evidence That Clinton Personally Signed Off On A Cable Reducing Security In Benghazi
She ignored 600 correspondences asking for additional support. Ignoring a problem doesn't fix it and it's a sign of cowardice or not giving a damn.
FACT: Intelligence Community, The Suspected Attackers, And Eyewitnesses All Linked The Inflammatory Anti-Islam Video To The Attacks
That's just a blatant lie. Answer the question about her family e-mails and her prime minister e-mails where she called it a "well planned AlQueda like attack". No mention of a video until the heat got turned up. You can ignore that but it's a printed fact.
Bottom line is this was a terrible tragedy and possibly could have been prevented, but Clinton bears no personal responsibility.
She does indeed. She was in charge of those embassies and responsible for the staffers. When Bush took us into Afghanistan he was responsible as Commander in Chief for any deaths. That's what responsibility is all about OM. Bush would accept that. Hillary, like Milk Toast, would not.
The purpose of the committee was supposed to be a "lessons learned" and to find ways to prevent it from happening in the future. Instead, it was a republican witch hunt. (yeah, I know, you think she is a witch)
I agree some of the GOP made it a witch hunt. Some of the dems made it a testimonial dinner for her. Ultimately they were there to find the truth which you can't get out of a blatant liar. she lied on at least four questions that day. You can accept those lies as a true blue dem. But printed word will always out those who verbally lie.
Nice of you to allow her to emerge from her coma at 90.
Absolutely. This will give Bill a few years to boink another intern and Hillary will have a good excuse to be asleep at the wheel.
OM, I love your passion and appreciate the strong debate. You represent that side well.
on October 28, 2015, 1:25 pm, in reply to "