Clarification Archived Message
Posted by 3Dee  on February 12, 2011, 8:32 am, in reply to "Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010"
I think it's these teachers I worry about. They are more than adequate to be teachers but they might at times get boring. They may at times be prone to snapping. Some of these teachers, still in the decent teacher category are prone to bullying as well.
What I mean is that they are prone to getting bullied by the students.
A person may know their stuff, may care and may even have an effective methodology - but some a$$#0!@ kid may start making jokes about how fat she is or to how he dresses. Effective classroom management can diffuse the problem - but sometimes it wears the teacher down and sending students to the office is really not effective if the students themselves don't even care.
They would care if they had hell to pay when they got home for making a total @$$ of themselves in class.
Norad's cartoon hit the nail on the head! If that mentality would prevail, education would change overnight.
|
Message Thread:
- When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - Norad February 12, 2011, 1:26 am
- Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - ramsfan February 12, 2011, 1:31 am
- Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - bob February 12, 2011, 1:48 am
- Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - metalhedz February 12, 2011, 1:54 am
- Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - metalhedz February 12, 2011, 1:59 am
- Re: When Your Kids Get Terrible Grades: 1960 Vs 2010 - 3Dee February 12, 2011, 8:08 am
|
|
