on the radio earlier, he said Robins has been thrown under the bs because not only did he do nothing wrong not telling Starmer, he is expressly not to disclose any details. He also couldnt understand the way it was being reported, he said you dont pass or fail these things, its a risk assessment. No ide how true all that is, but this was guy with experience of the system, he wasnt defending Starmer, he was accusing him of making a scapegoat of Robins, but he was saying it was perfectly normal and indeed by design that Starmer wouldnt know.