on April 17, 2026, 11:22 pm, in reply to "There was an ex civil servant and mate of Ollie Robins "
It's perfectly normal for the results of a vetting process not to be shared with the people who commissioned it?
If it's a risk assessment then that's even worse, the details would have been given, and they would have screamed "this man is a wrong 'un". So we're saying the risk assessment failed, or that it wasn't seen as important enough to bother sharing, or what?
Previous Message
on the radio earlier, he said Robins has been thrown under the bs because not only did he do nothing wrong not telling Starmer, he is expressly not to disclose any details. He also couldnt understand the way it was being reported, he said you dont pass or fail these things, its a risk assessment. No ide how true all that is, but this was guy with experience of the system, he wasnt defending Starmer, he was accusing him of making a scapegoat of Robins, but he was saying it was perfectly normal and indeed by design that Starmer wouldnt know. Previous Message
this is the man that rightly told us that Johnson was insulting people's intelligence by saying he didn't know about COVID parties at number 10.
His version of events is that the Foreign Office lied to him. Why would they do that?
Bullshit, and it's no wonder people are turning to Reform, as much as I think it's stupid and misguided to do so.
Greed used to have to put on makeup and sit at the table pretending to be ambition.
Now it gets its own place at the head of the table, beating its chest and demanding more.
Responses