This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Not looking good for City

    Posted by The OutsiderUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:19:41
    VIP

      Re: Not looking good for City

      Posted by Evening PosterUser icon on 29/9/2026, 21:37:09, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

      I am expecting an immediate legal demand from the club, for Haaland to return the match ball after the FA Cup match at Kenilworth Road! 😉

        But…but….but….

        Posted by DarandoUser icon on 29/9/2026, 18:32:07, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

        ….Citeh are adamant they have ‘irrefutable evidence’ that they are not guilty of these breaches: this is a term they’ve been using since last week.

        So where is this ‘irrefutable evidence’ and hasn’t it already been put before the commission who have rubbished it?

          Re: Not looking good for City

          Posted by Andy CappuccinoUser icon on 29/9/2026, 18:15:52, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

          The lawyers will find a technicality to get them off the hook

            Re: Not looking good for City

            Posted by GoddersUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:43:05, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

            I do hope so because as they've bow been proven to have broken the rules to such a degree, essentially fraudulently, not only to have gained a significant sporting advantage but also guilty of criminal activity. They should have the bottle to relegated then to tier 8.

            They surely can't get away without any relegation at all.


            Live justly, love mercy, perpetuate generosity, walk humbly.

              Re: Not looking good for City

              Posted by KbotUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:37:05, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

              It’s still under appeal. If that ends up with a continued guilty finding I’m not convinced the punishment will fit the crime. The PL have made a point but won’t have the stomach for much else. No -30 for citeh.

                Re: Not looking good for City

                Posted by Music CriticUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:46:08, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                Ordinarily I'd agree. But the language the Prem is using is brutal

                'Sham', 'systematically broke rules', 'deliberate or reckless conduct intended to circumvent the Premier League rules'

                That's pretty strong stuff. I think they're fucked. You're right, there won't be -30. They might well be getting relegated to League 2 at the end of the season and they'll have to play out this season knowing that

                Another thing that makes me think the Prem might throw the book at them is they want to show teeth to the incoming regulator and say to them 'look, we can regulate ourselves'

                UEFA will probably ban them from Europe too, although that might not be a problem for them for a few years

                We shall see

                  Re: Not looking good for City

                  Posted by KbotUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:56:00, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                  I hope you’re right. PL good at talking the talk but walking it I’m not convinced. Bit like the banks, too big to fail. Love to see them relegated.

                    Re: Not looking good for City

                    Posted by Music CriticUser icon on 29/9/2026, 18:18:28, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                    The appeal is the unknown and that could go against the Prem but with the time taken on this and the lawyers they have, I'd be amazed if there has been any significant errors there

                    If the appeal, largely or fully, fails, their punishment is going to be severe

                      Re: Not looking good for City

                      Posted by HHUser icon on 29/9/2026, 18:30:54, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                      A fraud just shy of a billion quid.

                      The PL saying they found City witnesses 'dishonest.'

                      I wonder if this breaches any criminal levels of fraud?

                        Re: Not looking good for City

                        Posted by Music CriticUser icon on 29/9/2026, 18:46:53, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                        Yes, certainly sounds like some of this is criminal behaviour.

                        Might be a diplomatic tightrope for the UK, I guess, but surely we should prosecute anybody for a crime? And, surely, this would mean the end of state-backed football club owners. Newcastle would be an interesting case if that happens.

                        What I don't understand is why they did it? Surely they had enough resources to grow Man City organically, fairly but still pretty quickly

                          Re: Not looking good for City

                          Posted by TonyBUser icon on 29/9/2026, 19:51:02, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                          Greed and Ego.
                          Just like the top of a very many organisations.


                          Black Labs Matter

                            Re: Not looking good for City

                            Posted by FarhatUser icon on 30/9/2026, 11:18:28, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                            Like Reform, Restore and the Tories.

                              Re: Not looking good for City

                              Posted by TonyBUser icon on 30/9/2026, 12:47:59, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                              Yep.
                              Plus Liebour of course.


                              Black Labs Matter

                                Re: Not looking good for City

                                Posted by FarhatUser icon on 30/9/2026, 13:31:22, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                                Absolutely.

                                But you're - presumably - over 18 and saying Liebour?

                                  Re: Not looking good for City

                                  Posted by TonyBUser icon on 30/9/2026, 14:18:11, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                                  Yes that correct.
                                  I thought I'd use that one today instead of Farrige, Lib Dumbs, Daily Fail, Grauniad.
                                  Just for some variety of course as some of the others have appeared numerous times very recently.


                                  Black Labs Matter

                                    Re: Not looking good for City

                                    Posted by J in CUser icon on 30/9/2026, 17:21:08, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                                    You are very stupid


                                    I live in Hatterfornolifes head

                            Re: Not looking good for City

                            Posted by Nearly a GeniusUser icon on 29/9/2026, 19:37:01, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"
                            Legend of Outlaws

                            Thinking they're too big to be punished like other clubs?

                              Re: Not looking good for City

                              Posted by J in CUser icon on 29/9/2026, 19:55:56, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                              Thank God we do not have these traits.


                              I live in Hatterfornolifes head

                                Re: Not looking good for City

                                Posted by Nearly a GeniusUser icon on 29/9/2026, 20:00:24, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"
                                Legend of Outlaws

                                Yep

                  Re: Not looking good for City

                  Posted by WiltUser icon on 29/9/2026, 17:24:28, in reply to "Not looking good for City"

                  Music to my ears.

                    Re: Not looking good for City

                    Posted by Jardine3User icon on 29/9/2026, 21:34:29, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"

                    Premier League only got themselves to blame for allowing dubious owners and countries to buy clubs. The chickens have come home to roast.

                      Re: Not looking good for City

                      Posted by Nearly a GeniusUser icon on 30/9/2026, 16:25:51, in reply to "Re: Not looking good for City"
                      Legend of Outlaws

                      Indeed.

                [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                DISCLAIMER

                The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                  Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                  What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                eXTReMe Tracker