If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: Not looking good for City
- Not looking good for City - The Outsider 29/9/2026, 17:19:41
- Re: Not looking good for City - Evening Poster 29/9/2026, 21:37:09
- But…but….but…. - Darando 29/9/2026, 18:32:07
- Re: Not looking good for City - Andy Cappuccino 29/9/2026, 18:15:52
- Re: Not looking good for City - Godders 29/9/2026, 17:43:05
- Re: Not looking good for City - Kbot 29/9/2026, 17:37:05
- Re: Not looking good for City - Music Critic 29/9/2026, 17:46:08
- Re: Not looking good for City - Kbot 29/9/2026, 17:56:00
- Re: Not looking good for City - Music Critic 29/9/2026, 18:18:28
- Re: Not looking good for City - HH 29/9/2026, 18:30:54
- Re: Not looking good for City - Music Critic 29/9/2026, 18:46:53
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 29/9/2026, 19:51:02
- Re: Not looking good for City - Farhat 30/9/2026, 11:18:28
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 30/9/2026, 12:47:59
- Re: Not looking good for City - Farhat 30/9/2026, 13:31:22
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 30/9/2026, 14:18:11
- Re: Not looking good for City - J in C 30/9/2026, 17:21:08
- Re: Not looking good for City - J in C 30/9/2026, 17:21:08
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 30/9/2026, 14:18:11
- Re: Not looking good for City - Farhat 30/9/2026, 13:31:22
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 30/9/2026, 12:47:59
- Re: Not looking good for City - Farhat 30/9/2026, 11:18:28
- Re: Not looking good for City - Nearly a Genius 29/9/2026, 19:37:01
- Re: Not looking good for City - J in C 29/9/2026, 19:55:56
- Re: Not looking good for City - Nearly a Genius 29/9/2026, 20:00:24
- Re: Not looking good for City - Nearly a Genius 29/9/2026, 20:00:24
- Re: Not looking good for City - J in C 29/9/2026, 19:55:56
- Re: Not looking good for City - TonyB 29/9/2026, 19:51:02
- Re: Not looking good for City - Music Critic 29/9/2026, 18:46:53
- Re: Not looking good for City - HH 29/9/2026, 18:30:54
- Re: Not looking good for City - Music Critic 29/9/2026, 18:18:28
- Re: Not looking good for City - Wilt 29/9/2026, 17:24:28
- Re: Not looking good for City - Jardine3 29/9/2026, 21:34:29
- Re: Not looking good for City - Nearly a Genius 30/9/2026, 16:25:51
- Re: Not looking good for City - Nearly a Genius 30/9/2026, 16:25:51
- Re: Not looking good for City - Jardine3 29/9/2026, 21:34:29

« Index | View all » - Re: Not looking good for City - Evening Poster 29/9/2026, 21:37:09
'Sham', 'systematically broke rules', 'deliberate or reckless conduct intended to circumvent the Premier League rules'
That's pretty strong stuff. I think they're fucked. You're right, there won't be -30. They might well be getting relegated to League 2 at the end of the season and they'll have to play out this season knowing that
Another thing that makes me think the Prem might throw the book at them is they want to show teeth to the incoming regulator and say to them 'look, we can regulate ourselves'
UEFA will probably ban them from Europe too, although that might not be a problem for them for a few years
We shall see
Message Thread | This response ↓
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.
on 29/9/2026, 17:46:08, in reply to "