This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Jack Wilshire
Posted by Frog Hatter on 11/10/2025, 9:27:57
I cannot see this happening. Why go from a youn, relatively inexperienced coach that could not change the culture…to an even younger, less experienced one?? Unless we are going to blood the youngsters with a view to probably still being in this division next year. If that was plan then Lawless with an experienced number 2 would be the answer.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Voice of reason on 11/10/2025, 14:05:47, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
He’s made great progress in coaching with Arsenal and he is close with Steve Bould who would be a kick arse no 2 and experienced defensive coach. Those two together would be as good as anything else in League 1
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Notorious D on 11/10/2025, 14:16:50, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Posted by North Beds Hatter on 11/10/2025, 13:25:55, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
Presumably because he’s worked with Yousuf Sajjad in the past, just like Reuell Walters, Cohen Bramall and every other underwhelming signing we bring in who happened to be in Arsenal’s youth set up at some time. Quite deflating to be honest.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Madpig on 11/10/2025, 10:56:37, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
The Cambridge game said to me we've not got anyone here that can do it.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Oliver Cromwell on 11/10/2025, 10:46:24, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
Ideal for him as he lives in St Albans. 😊😊
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by bbb on 11/10/2025, 10:30:54, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
He's coming home.
DEAL WITH IT
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Luton thru and thru on 11/10/2025, 10:01:39, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
I think we should go for Brady because it’s a name, that just maybe, most people will be able to spell. No chance with Wiltshire, Wilshire, Wilshete etc.“Control the controllables”
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Zobra The Greek on 11/10/2025, 10:33:40, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
came here to say the same thing
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by MVhatter on 11/10/2025, 11:22:46, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
We need a Wiltshere Hartford coaching team.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Zobra The Greek on 11/10/2025, 12:18:34, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Clarke as club captain
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Findlay on 11/10/2025, 9:49:14, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
Given the money that has been spent on players and relatively high wage bill, there is zero chance we are writing off this season.
We are 3 point outside the playoffs with 35 games left. So whoever comes in will be targeting promotion.
Given the lack of options, either Wilshere+Bould or Wellens look like the only credible options.
Wilshere would at least be something different, but of course its a gamble.
Wellens would shake things up, just not sure he would be a Sweet type.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Cuba on 11/10/2025, 9:48:42, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
Top class young players moving into management, instant respect from playing squad.
I doubt any of our players knew who Bloomfield was, despite him having an excellent player career at this level.
If it is JW and Steve Bould, there can be no similar excuse.
GON and Scott Parker moved very successfully into management soon after retirement and I would expect 2020 are looking at that angle now.
Plus if JW does well there is likely an opportunity for a decent release fee….
Not sure why we have this fascination with former players like Lawless etc, we need a complete change and a huge kick up the arse and some new fresh ideas.
JW played and worked at Arsenal and then did well as coach at Norwich, it’s his time to step up and if he want the job then I would give it to him.
We don’t have much more to lose.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Bootin on 11/10/2025, 12:21:05, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Agree entirely.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by The Outsider on 11/10/2025, 12:11:52, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire " VIP
Not sure why we have this fascination with former players
What was Jack Wilshere's first club?
I doubt any of our players knew who Bloomfield was, despite him having an excellent player career at this level.
If it is JW and Steve Bould, there can be no similar excuse.
Steve Bould had finished playing before half of our players were born.
Would Steve Bould want to drop down a division?
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by NorthLondonHatter on 11/10/2025, 12:58:28, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
His first club was Arsenal
Everyone knows who JW is, the players would respect him. He would be the best player in training.
Appreciate it's a risk but so is Wellens
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by The Outsider on 11/10/2025, 13:53:49, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire " VIP
His first club was Luton.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by NorthLondonHatter on 11/10/2025, 15:28:33, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
As a youngster
Never played for the first team - he was 12
Arsenal was his first team
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by The Outsider on 11/10/2025, 15:33:11, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire " VIP
He was quite a bit younger than that - he left us when he was 9.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by NorthLondonHatter on 11/10/2025, 15:35:16, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Yes as a schoolboy
That was my point.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Farhat on 11/10/2025, 15:18:20, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Unbelievable that the *new* North London Hatter didn't know that. Probably too busy being wound up by JinC.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by NorthLondonHatter on 11/10/2025, 15:30:09, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
I knew he was at Luton at 12 but don't include that.
Why "new"
JinC ? Don't folow
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Flash on 11/10/2025, 10:54:13, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
He's within a spitting distance of it.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Red Kite on 11/10/2025, 9:43:42, in reply to "Jack Wilshire "
But if the club believed that Wilshere had the best potential, the you could use the same argument to say Wilshete plus an experienced number 2., similar argument to Lawlless.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by TheDunstableWindsock on 11/10/2025, 9:47:03, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Frankly its getting harder to rationally fathom out any decisions, or lack of, that are coming out of the club these days.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by Luss Pierre on 11/10/2025, 10:14:19, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
Oh for the days of Roger Duckworth at the Evening Post.
Re: Jack Wilshire
Posted by since 63 on 11/10/2025, 12:00:37, in reply to "Re: Jack Wilshire "
With Brian Swain, now they were real legends of the press box.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
on 11/10/2025, 9:27:57
came here to say the same thing 