Re: Wallace - Again
Posted by Lance Drysdale


on July 14, 2025, 11:58 am, in reply to "
Wallace - Again"
In respect of your question, I suspect that if we saw all of the specific allegations and could reference those against a library of filmed footage and other supporting evidence (call sheets, dates/locations of filming, production notes etc etc) that we'd be in reasonable position to draw a distinction between where sufficient evidence exists to point to the probability of a happening, as opposed to an improbability. It's that balance of probability and standard of reasonableness that's the basic measurement in these kinds of complaint/allegation, rather than the stricter standard applied to a criminal case for instance.
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
Wallace - Again - Sherpa July 14, 2025, 11:04 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - GwladysTreat Yesterday, 1:07 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Tonytaxi1970 Yesterday, 12:57 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Otto Yesterday, 9:18 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - Platinii July 14, 2025, 4:52 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - NoelBlakeFanClub Yesterday, 1:16 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Touching_Cloth Yesterday, 12:53 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Twainy Yesterday, 12:52 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Lick_Myons Yesterday, 12:23 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Brewtality Yesterday, 12:11 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - passinginterest Yesterday, 9:50 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - tricky9999 Yesterday, 9:20 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - No_One_Ever_Replies Yesterday, 8:57 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - Sherpa Yesterday, 8:21 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - StringerBellend01 Yesterday, 8:16 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - Barra6 July 14, 2025, 11:40 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - bluegenes July 14, 2025, 5:02 pm
- Re: Wallace - Again - Lance Drysdale July 14, 2025, 11:58 am
- Re: Wallace - Again - Yogi_Clementine July 14, 2025, 11:08 am
 « Back to index | View thread » |