Posted by John Bennett on 2/5/2022, 9:21 am, in reply to "Re: Duplicate Birth Registration" Thank you Sally for your rapid response(s), Your theory makes sense, but it would have made more sense for the Q4/1950 index to have had a note to say 'Actual birth occurred in Q3/1949'. Regards, John Message Thread Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 1/5/2022, 7:25 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Sally Topliss 1/5/2022, 10:35 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Sally Topliss 1/5/2022, 9:43 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 2/5/2022, 9:21 am Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Karen Newman 2/5/2022, 11:21 am Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 3/5/2022, 1:34 pm « Back to index | View thread »
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message (you may include HTML): Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post. Please enter the numbers above. This helps stop spam.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Your Name:
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.