Posted by John Bennett on 2/5/2022, 9:21 am, in reply to "Re: Duplicate Birth Registration" Thank you Sally for your rapid response(s), Your theory makes sense, but it would have made more sense for the Q4/1950 index to have had a note to say 'Actual birth occurred in Q3/1949'. Regards, John Message Thread Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 1/5/2022, 7:25 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Sally Topliss 1/5/2022, 10:35 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Sally Topliss 1/5/2022, 9:43 pm Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 2/5/2022, 9:21 am Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - Karen Newman 2/5/2022, 11:21 am Re: Duplicate Birth Registration - John Bennett 3/5/2022, 1:34 pm « Index | View all »
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message (you may include HTML): 😀 😁 😂 🤣 😊 😉 😍 😘 😎 🤔 😐 🙄 😮 😲 😱 😢 😭 😡😴 🤪 👍 👎 👌 👏 🙏 ❤️ 🎉 🤗 😇 😛 😜 😬 😞 😕 😤 🤯 Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Your Name:
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.