Is what Lawrence postulates what happend?
Well, thats another matter entirely, but it was, again, possible so I dont think it should be rejected out of hand (by closed minds).
Previous Message
Good thing it wasn't you guys who fought the war....it'd still be going on! Previous Message
I should have added, IF the same practice was used on Hood, that definitely COULD have been a contributing factor. Previous Message
Battle cruiser losses at Jutland occurred because of the practice of the magazine crews leaving the blast doors open for more rapid transfer of shells and propellent to the elevators. Hood had stocks of 5" (?) AA stacked down the corridors. A direct hit on the magazine was not necessary, as a hit anywhere else on that deck would have detonated the AA ammo and caused a sympathetic explosion all the way back to the main magazine...BOOM!! Previous Message
Previous Message
I can't believe I never saw anything about this.
https://historyfirst.com/hms-hood-sunk-by-mechanical-failure-not-bismarck/
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Last-Resting-Place-by-Martin-Lawrence/
Responses