Posted by opinionated on December 21, 2022, 10:22 pm
So the ringer that was brought in to secure a three year deal for Dr. Cann isn’t running to retain that appointed seat. Keep in mind that the people interviewed to fill the vacancy were asked if they would commit to running in April because that was important to them.
Then, after all that planning by the Board, Ms. Bryant’s vote wasn’t needed as an assumed no vote gave in at the last minute and cast the necessary vote to extend the contract.
Bryant abstained (she was too new to vote anyway) Willmsmeyer abstained (relative) Venne yes Knogl yes Nunn yes Curran yes Stacy NO
So as some speculated, Bryant was just a ringer brought in for a vote with no intention of running. Remember these people at election time. Very disappointed in two of the members. Knogl and Venne were shoe ins.
On a bright note, there are loopholes in every contract. Dr. Cann was brought in from the outside and hasn’t moved the needle on test scores and seems to only be interested in getting her picture on FB. Admittedly she’s an attractive young woman so it’s better than looking at Nancy Pelosi. LOL
There are nine choices for candidates and only one incumbent. Looking forward to hearing their views. Hopefully a public forum will be held.
on December 21, 2022, 10:22 pm