Posted by Mike on March 1, 2015, 7:58 pm, in reply to "Re: Link to salaries for 2014"
I alleged nothing. Merely pointing out a convenient loophole in the district's reporting practices, that is apparently being questioned (along with several other points) by their paid auditor.
My mistake. You did say "hypothetically" And hypothetically, this naughty man proclaimed he was not going to go down silently. But hypothetically he did.
And as taxpayers, it would only seem reasonable that you and Clancy both would take exception with the monies we are talking about being omitted, intentionally, from the financial report filed with the state, audited by the auditors, and handed off to the people whose taxes pay for these things.
Absolutely but I'm missing something. The auditors didn't find the information that we all did? In one of the tables it indicates an employee was paid the retirement incentive. Isn't that the unused sick leave?