Meeting in the middle and seeing that the person who votes a different way still loves their country is a unique and honorable way to look at things. You're one of few who can come up from the swamp for a breath of fresh air once in a while...and I've always respected that.

I won't go out to defend Kamala and Walz this time, though I don't think the assault on Walz in particular is warranted.

When it comes to military and foreign policy, I would then ask why the very people he appointed to lead have now turned against him.

They were honorable people when Trump appointed them, but now are detestable because they have turned on Trump? There could never be accountability for the Donald.

He appointed Mattis, retired four-star general to chief of staff John Kelly was another retired four-star general, two of his national security advisers were three-star generals, Michael Flynn and H. R. McMaster.

What do they have to say about the Donald?

"“Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us.” " - Mattis

"Trump’s “ego and love of self… drove him to abandon his oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution,’ a president’s highest obligation.”
-McMaster

McChrystal stated: he is voting for Vice President Kamala Harris because of her “character.” In the past, he has said Trump is “immoral” and “dishonest.”

You don't need to take my word....read about what the generals who served while he was Commander in Chief had to say....and why they wouldn't wish that on the Country again. Read for yourself

You didn't like it when people talked about Trump's multiple deferments in the war in Vietnam...and now you criticize Walz' service record?

Yeah, I am quite alright in not electing a megalomaniac who would turn the US Military on the 'Enemies from within' and in turn, turn the military on his own people.

He is no friend of the US Military....Arlington National Cemetery to him is just a prop for a photo opp.