Actually the people on that page are asking those questions. Personally if they vote today or tomorrow it has no effect on me.
Her page is similar to a CNN poll. It probably reflects more of her followers than you think but not a fair representation of all GC voters.
Just remember though that the lifting of this antiquated policy won't end nepotism. Don't forget that the administration and Board have friends from afar. In fact, it's a strong possibility that the rush on this may be to accomplish just that.
I only hope that the school board meeting isn't swarmed with pajama pant wearing people holding signs with poor grammar and spelling. We had enough of that during the shutdown. The time to show dissatisfaction with the Board is the next time they run.
Oh and since I don't know you, there's no joy in making you look foolish over using the wrong word or spelling it incorrectly. You actually make a good point about the policy being antiquated for the need of the district. The word pursued could also be used in describing what this page owner is trying to do to the board. LOL!