I’d expect another six points to be deducted for the second charge…but could be four or five, if they feel we were trending in the right direction. The good news is Forest should receive at least the same, as their breach seems more egregious.
But presumably the focus of our appeal was that it was disproportionate.
The focus of our second appeal should be that it’s double jeapordy.
I sincerely hope that the second charge anticipates future appeals and to me it seems that Forest should now get a 6 point deduction and we should get 2, given that we can only be tried on a proportion of the period in question.
Confirmed nt
Responses