this is convenient. I am a fan of science, so I would like to know more*Archived Message
Posted by NOBSTER on February 24, 2017, 17:06:57, in reply to "it has?*"
Previous Message
Previous Message
It's just that Roe v Wade is a horrific mess based on out of date science.
Previous Message
if we accept the premise that an 8-month old fetus is not a person, that this is just some growth inside a body, then of course it's fully within that person's right to remove that growth without requiring governmental approval.
if we accept the premise that an 8-month old fetus is a person, then of course anyone's right to remove that person from their body is secondary to the fetus-person's right to live.
every non-monster agrees with these things. the problem is gaining universal agreement on the premise, especially along the continuum from conception to birth.
that's because if there is a right answer, we have no means by which to discover it. right now this is a question of faith and philosophy.
despite that, about 40 years ago 7 lawyers presumed to speak for everyone on such matters, and people are rightfully upset about it.