If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- I've read the judgement
- I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 17:59:45
- Re: I've read the judgement - Herve Baquet 18/3/2024, 19:27:28
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sendero Luminoso 18/3/2024, 18:34:45
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:33:36
- Re: I've read the judgement - Godders 18/3/2024, 18:44:11
- Re: I've read the judgement - Godders 18/3/2024, 18:44:11
- Re: I've read the judgement - Swansea Hatter 18/3/2024, 18:26:44
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:35:56
- Re: I've read the judgement - Triggered 18/3/2024, 18:47:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:53:29
- Re: I've read the judgement - Triggered 18/3/2024, 19:11:20
- Re: I've read the judgement - Triggered 18/3/2024, 19:11:20
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:53:29
- Re: I've read the judgement - HuN 18/3/2024, 18:40:15
- Re: I've read the judgement - Triggered 18/3/2024, 18:47:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Back to the Futcher 18/3/2024, 18:29:50
- Re: I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 18:34:18
- Re: I've read the judgement - The Outsider 18/3/2024, 19:01:54
- Re: I've read the judgement - Help 18/3/2024, 19:07:05
- Re: I've read the judgement - Help 18/3/2024, 19:07:05
- Re: I've read the judgement - Music Critic 18/3/2024, 18:40:50
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:38:22
- Re: I've read the judgement - HuN 18/3/2024, 18:41:52
- Re: I've read the judgement - HuN 18/3/2024, 18:41:52
- Re: I've read the judgement - The Outsider 18/3/2024, 19:01:54
- Re: I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 18:34:18
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sandgrounder 18/3/2024, 18:35:56
- Re: I've read the judgement - Madpig 18/3/2024, 18:16:02
- Re: I've read the judgement - Toddingtonsteve 18/3/2024, 18:26:14
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sendero Luminoso 18/3/2024, 18:33:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Sendero Luminoso 18/3/2024, 18:33:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Toddingtonsteve 18/3/2024, 18:26:14
- Re: I've read the judgement - Highland Hatter 18/3/2024, 18:01:51
- Re: I've read the judgement - Godders 18/3/2024, 18:13:43
- Re: I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 18:03:24
- Re: I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 18:05:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Brko's Bicycle 18/3/2024, 18:05:12
- Re: I've read the judgement - Godders 18/3/2024, 18:13:43
It sounds like the Appeal decision for Everton wasn't as transparent about how they came to the specific penalty for them, so the Forest commission was trying to base the punishment on that precedent while being somewhat in the dark about how Everton's 6 point punishment was precisely arrived at.
It sounds like Forest Commission assumes the Everton penalty was :
3 points for breaking the rules
+3 points for trying to cover it up.
So based on that, Forest decision has gone:
3 points for breaking the rules
+3 points for breaking the rules by loads, cheating more than Everton
-2 for cooperating with the process and being transparent, rather than dragging their feet and covering tracks like Everton.
They've shown their working quite well tbf. Forest should consider themselves lucky, getting two points back for cooperation feels very generous. https://www.premierleague.com/news/3936397
Message Thread
« Back to index | View thread »
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.