The L.C. Smith Collectors Association
[ Message Archive | The L.C. Smith Collectors Association ]

    Re: help identifying this gun Archived Message

    Posted by Mike on May 27, 2007, 8:34 pm, in reply to "help identifying this fun"

    Thanks for the replies... I put more pictures up here:
    http://icorp.net/pix/lcsmith.htm

    I wrote Tom Martin and this is what he said:

    " Your L.C. Smith hammer gun was made by the Hunter Arms Co between 1890 and
    1894. It would be referred to as a type I hammer gun, and as you thought the
    "F" indicates the grade, which in this case, is the lowest grade made in the
    hammer guns. The hammer guns were always the lowest priced L.C. Smiths after
    the hammerless models were introduced.
    The value of your particular gun has been greatly impacted by the
    refinishing of both the metal and wood, particularly since the finish on the
    frame and barrels is not the correct finish. The frame, top lever and
    hammers would have originally been case hardened, with the barrels being
    rust blued.
    I can't tell for sure from the one picture you sent, but it appears that
    the barrels may have been hot blued and that often ruins them for use,
    because the caustic bluing solution attacks the solder that joins the
    barrels and ribs and causes them to separate. In any case, the barrels would
    have been made of Damascus steel, and the pattern would show clearly with
    original or properly refinished barrels."

    So someone sanded out the checkering on the stock? It looks so original I couldn't tell there used to be checkering. I am completely brokenhearted that someone blued over Damascus steel.. as little as I know about guns and knives, I certainly know that must have been a profoundly stupid idea. I knew LCs used Damascus but I assume this model didn't have a Damascus barrel, because, well, who would blue over Damascus? As a consolation, I did get this in Arkansas, which might explain some things... As to the bluing process, I can't find any evidence that this gun is "loose" in any location. It's very solid and tight. I cleaned the inside of the barrels last night and they looked good, though I'm no expert. I didn't see any flaws in the barrel. I apologize for the pictures - I'm still working on getting some stand lights to take better quality pictures but any additional info anyone might have is most appreciated.

    - Mike


    Message Thread: