: The idea behind the change in how wild card
: is determined was to promote a more lowman
: game. It would have worked well with the
: 5,2,2,2 lowman scoring system we had before
: the vote that changed everything. The
: change was meant to resolve a conflict
: second experienced when the game was nearing
: completion.. Does the player extend the game
: by protecting high man or does he try to
: stick close to lowman in the hopes of
: advancing as a wildcard. Now with the
: change in advances and changes in scoring
: system to 10, 7, 4 and 1.. There is still a
: conflict.. but a greater one I think because
: it is two fold in the first round. Now if
: third protects.. the person takes the chance
: of losing three points and becoming forth;
: with no chance of even getting the wild card
: position. It works slightly better in the
: second round, but still with conflict..
: --Previous Message--
: Maybe we can revisit the wildcard again?
: to win, and also attempting to be the
: closest to 4th place is weird! Opinions?