![]() Stoneridge Engineering Home |
Cont. Error in today's science
Posted by Raheman Velji on 11/20/2003, 7:06 pm All three inventions work on Newton's law that "every action has an equal and opposite reaction." The idea is to harness the "action" and elimenate the "reaction". --- |-| 1) The Simple Newton Engine The Simple Newton Engine is simply a cylinder with a piston ("P"). The idea is to force the piston down the shaft either by using electromagnets or the explosion of gas. (The piston may require wheels to move about the cylinder.) The cylinder itself will move forward, and the piston will move down the cylinder. The piston must be stopped before it slams into the back of the cylinder, either by friction or by a method which converts the "negative" energy into something usuable. When the piston has reached the end, it must be moved to the front of the cylinder, perhaps by a motor. --- |-| |-| 2) The Semi-Circular Newton Engine The Semi-Circular Newton Engine is like the Simple Newton Engine, except that the piston moves through a semi-circular loop. Thus, the "negative energy" changes direction by 90 degrees, and in doing so becomes usuable energy which can propel the cylinder, or chamber, further. The internal combustion engine has four parts: the intake stroke, the compression stroke, the combustion stroke, and the exhaust stroke. As the piston moves through the Semi-circular Newton Engine, the combustion stroke for one part of the loop can be the compression stage for the other side of the loop. That leaves the intake and exhaust strokes which must fit in. --- mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm --- 3) The Newton Motor Front view: --------- <-- wire cylinder /\ -- --------------------------------------------- Consider an Earth that is stationary and is not affected by any external forces. Alone on the Earth is a hummingbird sitting in its nest in the world's last tree. The rest of the Earth is totally lifeless and motionless. Suddenly, the hummingbird, which has a mass of 5 grams, begins to hover 3 kilometers off the ground. The downward gravitational force on the hummingbird is given by the equation F = G*m_b*m_e / r^2 where G is the gravitatiional constant Now, this hummingbird is resilient and has enough energy to hover above the ground for 10^19 years. It is obvious that the hummingbird is converting chemical energy into kinetic energy. By doing so, two things happen; one, the hummingbird is pushed upward, and two, air is pushed downward. Since the hummingbird is a fair enough distance from the Earth (3km to be exact), the downward force on the air molecules never actually reach the ground because it gets distributed amongst the other air particles. And so, as this force is distributed amongst billions of molecules, none of them will ever gain a sufficient velocity to reach the ground. So, we took care of all the forces, right? Wrong! We only considered the gravitational force of the earth on the bird. But what about the gravitational force of the bird on the earth? That force creates an acceleration of a = G*m_b / r^2 After 10^19 years, when the hummingbird returns to its nest, the Earth will be traveling at a velocity of a = 8.221426476641*10^(-27) meters/second^2 t = 10^19 years v = a * t The Earth was stationary and now it's moving! Can you account for the energy? Where did the energy to move the Earth come from? We have already accounted for the bird's energy which simply pushed air. You see, as the bird was hovering, we could say that the bird is perpetually falling to the Earth. Likewise, the Earth was perpetually falling toward the hummingbird. And thus, the vectors of the forces cancel each other out! Now, I hope you can clearly see and appreciate that gravity (and other forces) create kinetic energy out of nothing. Some of you may argue at this point that the bird's chemical energy was converted to the Earth's kinetic energy. That's quite ridiculous because, as we saw earlier, the chemical energy of the bird was transferred to kinetic energy of wind particiles; and so, the chemical energy is already accounted for. What does all of this mean? It means that perpetual motion and free energy devices do not contradict reality! --------------------------------------------- by Raheman Velji
|
![]() |