Previous Message
In the unlikely event that we have enough cover in midfield then I wouldn't have a problem with him going out on loan at this stage of his career but I do think that's a fairly harsh appraisal of his time with us so far.
When he first came in he looked far better than I think most of us were expecting (although obviously raw in a few areas and the team didn't perform well overall) then he got an injury that took him out for 3 months and when he got back he was only a bit-part player for the rest of the season and did look a bit rusty, but we only lost 2 of the games he played in, and they were against Man City and Liverpool, so I think it's a bit of a harsh view overall.
Tim Iroegbunam 24/25 - Transfermarkt Previous Message
Not his biggest fan. Careless.
I’d like us to get him out on loan. Not good enough to get playing time with us. Either that or get rid. Previous Message
Does that mean:
- They’ll sell Isak to Liverpool
- we won’t be the only PL team with the option of going two up front with mobile and physically capable centre forwards. Previous Message
Four might just about do it, starters for RB, CM and RW and competition/starter for LB.
Then we would have
GK: Pickford, Travers
RB: X, O'Brien, Coleman, Patterson
CB: Branthwaite, Tarkowski, O'Brien, Keane
LB: Y, Mykolenko
CM: Z, Gana, Garner, Alcaraz, Iroegbunam, Armstrong (probably will go out on loan)
RW: Q, McNeil/Ndiaye
LW: Ndiaye, McNeil
CF: Barry, Beto, Chermiti
Wings would still be a bit light but apart from that not a complete disaster.
Responses
on July 15, 2025, 10:52 am, in reply to "