on July 1, 2025, 4:01 pm, in reply to "but if you sign two then one of them will come in knowing they are second choice"
Previous Message
which means they will probably not be great if they are willing to accept that role. Previous Message
but he can't cross, is much better cutting in on his right and you'd be moving him from his most effective position. So essentially weakening two positions.
Alcaraz should never play wide again
McNeil, he can do a job there, but again much better on the left or through the middle. But out of the 3 he's the best option to fill on the right.
Get two RW's and none of this matters
Previous MessagePrevious Message
I think a starting RW and backup RW are the biggest priorities.
We currently have no RW's at all. If we only sign one that means someone is going to have to "fill in" if our only RW is out.
I know we're not going to get everything we need, we never do, but addressing the area we currently have no suitable options for has to be first on the list.
That Tom Fellows (The new John Oster ) at £10 million would be the ideal back up RW Previous Message
Priority:
Starting RW
Starting CF
Starting CM (unless Gueye re-signs)
Important:
Starting RB
Another CM
Backup GK
Another CB (unless Keane re-signs)
Nice to have:
Another RW
Another LB
Where “another” implies either a young profile with a high ceiling or an older player with experience on a free. Previous Message
...
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time.
Responses