Posted by Ezy on April 26, 2025, 1:40 pm, in reply to "That was a strange substitution. Nt" It’s a shame Previous Message N They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time. Responses Its sad, Moyes 2.0 is reverting to Moyes 1.0 nt - Col April 26, 2025, 2:15 pm 'Moyes 1.0' was consistently better than anything else we've seen in the last 35 years. - Tim B April 26, 2025, 2:19 pm 35 years is stretching it - Col April 26, 2025, 2:27 pm I was focusing on the consistent part! - Tim B April 26, 2025, 2:36 pm Er, 'expansive', not expensive, thanks autocorrect. Although both are likely true! nt - Tim B April 26, 2025, 2:38 pm Away at Chelsea, unlucky not to come away with a point…I don’t think he got that much wrong tbh… - Robin April 26, 2025, 2:33 pm If definitely improved after the hour mark tbf - Col April 26, 2025, 2:36 pm « Back to index
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: clear Please Log in or Register. Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms. Upload
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.
Previous Message
Previous Message
on April 26, 2025, 1:40 pm, in reply to "