... open a window into the Trumpista mindset, rather than justifiying it?
but that piece is normalising Trump's insane behaviour far too much for me. Giving him credit for working hard and having great energy for a 78-year-old rather misses the point.
Hearing a lot of "yeah Trump's horrible but..." comments lately.
He's a nut job serial criminal whose former subordinates have either been sent to prison or stated that he's unfit for office.
"Own the libs".
He's a senile, narcissistic orange-faced clown with the logical reasoning and communication skills of a particularly stupid and petulant toddler.
Deep state.
He's stated he wants to end the constitution and tried to overthrow democracy by whipping up a mob of crazed cultists who only failed because they were too stupid to properly organise themselves. He would have extra powers next time.
Yebbut, Kamala is not a great public speaker.
I'll concede one thing, he is great at conning people. Why some of them keep going back for more, you'd have to ask them.
Honestly, I am staggered at the false equivalence.
Here's a nice example of one particular yebbut's incoherence being exposed. Ignore the rather hyperbolic headline.
?si=6Lfu5YaS3mmsVRUJ
https://www.thetimes.com/article/a3c06599-57db-4be1-9790-dd5d09b5318f?shareToken=5848b0e0749babee7eb7d972f8de3fe2
play the games / hold the election as they say.
But I've noticed that there's more and more concern about what Trump will do if he loses. Is this just anxiety, or am I missing something? He's a dotard with a few armed nutjobs, not a general with the backing of the army and air force. There might be some low-level violence, especially if the count drags on for a few days, but I don't see any risk of general social unrest / 18 Brumaire 1799 / Santiago 1973. Or am I wrong? (And to be clear: *any* violence around an election is a disaster for a country that until 2020 had managed the peaceful transfer of power in every election since 1796.)
Speaking of tedious...here's Mazzzzzzz
Responses