Is the notion that our penalty was greater than Forest’s due to ‘the provision of incorrect information’:
‘However, there was no additional consideration around incorrect information being provided to the Premier League, as Everton had. The Commission does not know how the three extra points were arrived at by the Appeal Board for Everton, but some part of those three points must relate to the provision of incorrect information.’
I’ve seen a LOT of commentary saying (e.g.): ‘The difference between you and Forest is you deliberately provided incorrect information and misled the PL’ (which the commission overseeing our appeal noted was not the case). Won’t be long before that becomes an accepted truth, if someone doesn’t correct it.
The club should be on the front foot saying e.g. that we note with interest that the inconsistent messaging from the two independent commissions carries a false implication that EFC were deducted more points than NFFC due to deliberately ‘providing incorrect information.’
Speaking of tedious...here's Mazzzzzzz
Responses