‘The Commission does not know how the three extra points were arrived at by the Appeal Board for Everton.’
How can they possibly apply deductions with any sort of consistency and integrity when they’re literally admitting to making it up as they go along and being unable to cite precedent?
My mind is utterly blown.
....rather than all the hypothesizing on social media. You can find it here: Independent Commission’s full written reasons
Everton are mentioned 81 times in the 50 page document, and Sections 14.13 - 14.17 give the summary of why it's 4 points:
They breached by far more than us (nearly £35m compared to our £19.5m) and those 2 points they got back from mitigation were for "the early plea and the cooperation" and they imply that our harsher penalty "must have been for incorrect information"
Responses