if someone advances a series of theses I'm kind of compelled to test them (this is currently a very not smart compulsion indeed - it never really is.)

You'd have had to address issues of mandate, self-interested manoeuvrings by our betters within their ruthless, bespoke class framework plus a raft of barefaced lies, elisions, reprisals, flamboyantly (and, in my opinion, epoch-defining) hyperauthoritarian countermeasures and cover-ups in defence of the above.

They'd have had to address issues of essentialism and its fascist underpinnings - however this is complicated by somewhat trendier and rather stringently enforced bourgeois narratives grounded in essentialism with, y'know, fascist underpinnings.