I guess some of the people covering the WNBA do nothing else in the press... but someone who is say, the beat writer for both the Indiana Pacers and the Indiana WNBA team? Do they always show bias?
Who knows.
No. I am only talking about people who include political commentary in . .
a man like Ti-Cuck who went to college, "did everything right," but is still unequivocally a loser by any metric. These people, and I would certainly include any sports commentator in this category, are simply not economically viable, yet they are incapable of linking their personal output with any market with people who would ever want to buy their output.
The demand for labor drops every day as machines get better and new machines are created. The modern leftist, armed with a degree in Angry Studies or something equally as useless, will in turn blame some rich guy or capitalism for the fact that no one wants to buy their worthless output. No effort is made to improve their value proposition, just to come up with arguments about how it is unfair and how the government needs to provide for them for the mere act of existing. They then feel the need to spread this ideology and its identitarian offspring every single day because it dominates their thoughts.
The best thing you can do is to contribute to the diminution in value of this drivel and cease consuming it. I have no idea who you are talking about. These people hate you, don't give them your money or attention (which they can then monetize).
Previous Message
. . . their coverage. I am not going to assume the likely political leanings of someone who does not.
For example both Max Kellerman and Sarah Spain are sports reporters / commentators who wear their partisan politics on their sleeves.
"Iowa women were better than Illini men" - Potomac
on August 7, 2026, 12:36:06
Previous Message