deuce-ish: Because let me be clear. They start by vilifying billionaires but it doesn't end well

deuce-ish
[ Post a Response | deuce-ish ]

Because let me be clear. They start by vilifying billionaires but it doesn't end well

Posted by AceFrehley

on November 11, 2026, 11:07, in reply to "Also, anyone who believes in a wealth tax should be deported "

because soon it's going to be people with a net worth of over $1,000,000. And you wouldn't believe how many people you know that have a net worth of over $1,000,000. Once you get to a certain age, I wonder why you don't.

32

Message Thread | This response ↓

Congrats California for rejecting wealth tax - Potomac November 10, 2026, 17:05

can someone tell Warren what a constituent is? - AceFrehley Today, 11:38
Sounder doesn't know what AIPAC is - AceFrehley Today, 11:22
- Well, as we have seen time and time again over the years, he's pretty effing dumb.* - Lexillini Today, 11:58
Congrats Cal for forcing Disneyland to electrify its car ride - Potomac Today, 11:11
Speaking of a place that did put in a wealth tax - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 17:37
- ^this was not community noted at the time of posting. - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 20:18
  - The fact that it was 100% believable is still an issue for her and her party* - villain Yesterday, 12:42
- Ace…if you click through this is community noted for satire. * - haighter November 11, 2026, 19:37
  - Wasn't at the time.* - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 20:16
- I don't mean to disagree, but that's a property tax change, not a wealth tax* - Potomac November 11, 2026, 17:58
  - it's a shitty tax on the wealthy. The goal is to force the sale - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 20:19
    - I’m a bit conflicted on this one… - haighter Yesterday, 07:56
      - Force them to rent. So then they have to deal with the awful tenant laws in New York - AceFrehley Yesterday, 12:06
        
        Yea...I mean...my family is doing just that with leaving a house vacant due to tenant and tax laws.. - haighter Yesterday, 16:06
        
        your premise is flawed. You don't need a higher population. * - AceFrehley Yesterday, 17:22
        
        Well we definitely need more places to live unless we’re fine with it spiraling… - haighter Yesterday, 20:55
        
        So? Who cares? That's the part your missing. I want to live in Bel Air guess what?* - AceFrehley Yesterday, 21:08
  - Not a true “wealth tax” but it is a tax on the wealthy that have places there. According to AI - harb99 November 11, 2026, 19:17
Also, anyone who believes in a wealth tax should be deported - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 11:04
- Because let me be clear. They start by vilifying billionaires but it doesn't end well - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 11:07
WSJ: Progressives Lose California Wealth Tax Battle—but Aren’t Conceding the War - Potomac November 11, 2026, 07:25
- i'm going to be very careful how I word this - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 10:45
It was pretty simple to me...and I think people approached it differently... - haighter November 10, 2026, 22:31
- how about Prop 3 and Prop 42 on taxes? - Potomac November 11, 2026, 06:03
  - No and yes. - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 10:46
  - Yes on both. * - haighter November 11, 2026, 09:27
Speaking of rejecting. It was never about "democracy" - AceFrehley November 10, 2026, 19:58
- Smart move by her. It's easier to convince 5 leftists who have been planted - fratstud November 11, 2026, 09:20
  - We know their play book.* - AceFrehley November 11, 2026, 10:47
  - Washington state voted down the repeal of the special income tax - Potomac November 11, 2026, 09:28
The final nail is when it came out that the "billion" was not hard limit - AceFrehley November 10, 2026, 17:15

« Index | View all »

Post a Response