Lots of bitching at the Court for what are statutory interpretations
|
So much of what I've read about these cases is blaming the Court for what the statutes say.
If Congress wants to allow asylum seekers AT the border to apply, then do so.
If this decision helps provoke illegal immigration away from the ports of entry, that is not the Court's problem.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 SCOTUS: “arrive in” means being IN the country - Potomac June 25, 2026, 11:51:40
- Dumbest SC Justice in history. - AceFrehley July 1, 2026, 13:47:41
- If Congress limited birth tourism, it might survive the Court - Potomac July 1, 2026, 13:25:05
- So, what is the absolute end date for getting people to the Electoral College? - osklister June 30, 2026, 17:00:48
- Well, the Supreme Court taketh away with one hand and giveth with the other. - Lexillini June 30, 2026, 13:36:51
- The U.S. Constitution compels us to reward people for breaking the law. - Lexillini June 30, 2026, 12:26:33
- anyone else getting the trump passport? pretty sweet* - Playoff Rondo June 26, 2026, 19:12:50
- Lots of bitching at the Court for what are statutory interpretations - Potomac June 26, 2026, 12:51:13
- The Roundup cancer claims case was pretty easy I thought - Potomac June 25, 2026, 12:12:41
- A couple of good decisions from the Supremes today. - Lexillini June 25, 2026, 11:58:18
« Back to index | View thread » |
on June 26, 2026, 12:51:13, in reply to "SCOTUS: “arrive in” means being IN the country "