deuce-ish: No way insurance companies are paying that per month per person

deuce-ish
[ Post a Response | deuce-ish ]

No way insurance companies are paying that per month per person

Posted by AceFrehley

on May 26, 2026, 15:13:19, in reply to "They should cover it because it's going to lead to less costly issues down the line, but"

that is the rack rate anyone off the street can get. Insurance companies pay a fraction of that. One of the many issues with the current state of insurance.

31

Well, duh: weight loss drugs breaking employers' banks (WSJ) - Potomac May 24, 2026, 7:02:46

They should cover it because it's going to lead to less costly issues down the line, but - villain Yesterday, 13:07:20
- In theory it should lower health costs going forward but it could - fratstud Yesterday, 20:42:52
- maybe - but what if the savings are 20 years away and you pay $20K/yr for it* - Potomac Yesterday, 15:32:38
  - See my solution….it only costs $1k to $1.5k annually from compounding pharmacies* - villain Yesterday, 17:38:47
- No way insurance companies are paying that per month per person - AceFrehley Yesterday, 15:13:19
The SD here... - DFPS Yesterday, 10:15:51
interesting, thanks for posting* - Mismysteri May 24, 2026, 9:39:39

« Back to index | View thread »

Post a Response