With you Marsden- think a 6month deal for Garner is reasonable, especially for a player who has just scored 5 goals in his last 4 games! Given his injury record and age, think that is a sensible balance.

I could have accepted but not fully understood giving Hammond a one year deal based on his ‘potential’ but 2 years seems ridiculous - especially when we have not offered that to Raglan. I know players ages comes into it but surely one year would have been enough. He may be cheaper than others but surely you get what you pay for?

As for Sutton, he was a squad player at best in NL so how does that equate to a 2 year deal in Div 2.

Find those two baffling if I am honest.

Some reasonable signings so far - like Hannant - but nothing to get the blood pumping yet. Looking forward to more of a marquee signing next!