"The prevailing consensus that apparent smiling in monkeys and apes is not directly analogous to human smiling arises from a combination of evolutionary biology, behavioral studies, and facial expression research. Here’s a breakdown of the reasoning behind this view—and whether it can be convincingly challenged.
---
Why is it assumed that primate "smiles" are not analogous to human smiles?
1. Different Contexts and Functions
In many non-human primates, the expression that looks like a human smile (e.g., baring the teeth) is often observed in submissive, fearful, or tension-related situations.
For example, macaques and chimpanzees display a "fear grin" or "submissive bared-teeth display" when encountering a more dominant individual.
In contrast, the human smile typically arises from positive social bonding, pleasure, humor, or politeness—contexts associated with affiliation rather than fear or submission.
2. Anatomical and Neurological Differences
The musculature involved in facial expressions differs in subtle but meaningful ways. For instance, while the zygomaticus major (the muscle responsible for pulling the corners of the mouth up) exists in many primates, its use in expressions and its neural control can differ.
Humans also exhibit voluntary and involuntary (Duchenne) smiles, with different neural circuits involved (e.g., emotional centers like the basal ganglia versus motor control areas).
3. Evolutionary Development
Some theorists (e.g. Andrew Meltzoff, Paul Ekman) argue that human smiles evolved from primate fear or appeasement displays—but then diverged significantly in meaning and use.
The human social smile is seen as a highly evolved, context-flexible expression unique to our species’ advanced social cognition and emotional complexity.
4. Lack of Spontaneity and Laughter Link
Primate "smiles" often lack the spontaneity and emotional contagion seen in humans.
Although laughter-like vocalizations exist in apes during play (especially in chimpanzees and bonobos), the facial expressions associated with them differ from the human Duchenne smile.
---
Can this assumption be convincingly challenged?
Yes—but only partially. While the exact meanings and contexts differ, there are growing arguments that the continuity between human and primate expressions has been underestimated:
1. Continuity in Facial Musculature
Studies using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) adapted for chimps and macaques show that many of the same muscle groups are involved in expressions across species.
This anatomical similarity supports the idea that some shared expressive heritage exists—what differs is the function and social interpretation.
2. Play and Positive Emotion in Apes
Bonobos and young chimps often show facial expressions during rough-and-tumble play that involve bared teeth and upward-pulled lips.
These are increasingly viewed not just as mimicry of fear responses but as potentially affiliative or joyful, particularly in play contexts.
3. Human Smiling as a Co-Opted Display
Some evolutionary psychologists suggest that the human smile did evolve from the primate fear-grin or submissive display—but became repurposed for prosocial signaling in more complex human societies.
If true, this would imply a shared origin between the two, even if their current meanings differ.
4. Observations of Affection and Trust
In some primates—especially bonobos—facial expressions resembling human smiles occur during grooming, mating, and cooperative activities, hinting at positive valence rather than fear.
These contexts are more similar to human smiling and suggest affective overlap.
---
Conclusion
The consensus that monkey and ape “smiles” aren’t the same as human smiles rests on solid functional, contextual, and neurobehavioral grounds. However, this doesn't mean they are completely unrelated. It may be more accurate to say:
> “Certain primate facial expressions that resemble smiling are evolutionary precursors to human smiling, but their function and social significance have diverged through species-specific pathways.”
Challenging the consensus convincingly would involve highlighting:
Cases where primates use “smiles” in non-submissive, affiliative contexts.
Deeper understanding of the emotional correlates of these expressions via neuroscience.
Recognition that evolution can repurpose behaviors, and what once signaled fear may now signal friendliness in a different species.
Would you like an example of how a “challenge” might look in the form of a fictional field study or thought experiment?"
"Field study"
"Here is a fictional field study that challenges the consensus view by carefully documenting affiliative "smiling" behaviors in bonobos under controlled, observational conditions:
---
FIELD STUDY TITLE:
Reevaluating the Bared-Teeth Display in Bonobos: Evidence for Spontaneous Affiliation Signaling
Principal Investigator: Dr. Marissa Kailo, Department of Primate Cognition, University of New South Wales
Location: Lola ya Bonobo Sanctuary, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Duration: 24 months (2023–2025)
Funding: Global Primate Communication Initiative
---
ABSTRACT
The current consensus views the bared-teeth display in non-human primates as primarily a submissive or fear-related signal. This two-year observational study of a semi-wild bonobo community challenges that view by identifying consistent correlations between spontaneous "smile-like" facial expressions and affiliative social behaviors. Results suggest the bared-teeth expression may serve a dual communicative role in bonobos, including positive social signaling, with implications for the evolutionary roots of human smiling.
---
METHODOLOGY
Subjects: 37 bonobos (Pan paniscus), mixed-age and sex, semi-free-ranging
Tools: Modified Bonobo Facial Action Coding System (BoFACS), infrared cameras, ultrasonic parabolic microphones, biometric emotion sensors (non-invasive skin temperature readings)
Data Collection Protocol:
4 hours per day of focal-animal sampling, rotating individuals weekly
Key behaviors recorded: grooming, food sharing, rough-and-tumble play, sexual interactions, reconciliatory gestures, and spontaneous reunion events after separation
Coded facial expressions: bared-teeth display (BTD), relaxed open-mouth (ROM), lip-pouting, and neutral
---
KEY FINDINGS
1. BTD Occurrence in Affectionate Contexts
67% of recorded BTDs occurred outside conflict or dominance contexts, often during:
Pre-grooming approach rituals
Juvenile play episodes, especially those involving role reversal (e.g., mock chasing)
Post-separation reunions between close social partners
2. Synchrony and Emotional Valence
In 38% of instances, both bonobos in an affiliative dyad simultaneously exhibited BTDs—a rare pattern if the expression were purely submissive.
Thermographic data showed nasal and facial temperature increase during BTD episodes in these contexts, consistent with relaxation and social bonding, not fear or stress.
3. Vocalization Patterns
BTDs were accompanied by a soft, high-pitched "chirp" in 44% of affiliative instances—distinct from the low grunts typically associated with tension or submission.
4. Neonate Mimicry
Infants under 6 months showed a strong tendency to mirror maternal BTDs during breastfeeding pauses, often while making eye contact—suggestive of early social entrainment, not appeasement.
---
INTERPRETATION
The data suggest that the bared-teeth display in bonobos is not limited to appeasement or tension-reduction but functions flexibly as a signal of affection, reassurance, and prosocial intent in contexts devoid of aggression or rank negotiation.
This multi-contextual use mirrors the flexible deployment of smiling in humans—ranging from polite greeting to genuine mirth—implying that such expressions may have evolved not as entirely new functions, but as elaborations of ancestral behaviors.
---
CONCLUSION
The study provides empirical evidence that at least in bonobos, "smiling" may have a partial functional homology to human smiling. This does not claim identical meaning but undermines the sharp dichotomy often asserted in ethology between human smiles and primate bared-teeth displays.
> Implication: Human smiling may be less of a “unique adaptation” and more of a neotenized, socially generalized form of an ancestral primate facial expression that already had some affiliative uses.
---"
Message Thread
« Back to index