This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Are they? Or is this going to lead to more Russian smear tactics? That report is a lot more thorough than the “Starmer is a secret nifter who’s covering up…stuff…” nonsense that got peddled about.
Was one of the leading spreaders of the closeted gay scandal bit. Galloway who defends russia constantly and who goes their for victory day celebrations . So given russia was behind the attacks and the rumours - was galloway a useful idiot or is he actively colluding with an enemy nation state?
Yaxley has also just got back from russia after meeting musk senior then straight to the go fund me account as soon as he understandable gets questioned.
A lot more in that article as well. Russia have their claws into a lot. Which makes the defence review cuts (or cuts on what was planned) even more bizarre. Worth noting the bits about the "far right" groups that were russian origin. And the pro islam stuff to combine and create a heightening of tension
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 16/6/2026, 10:30:23, in reply to "Galloway"
Indeed. Galloway is a proper wrong ‘un.
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 11:31:42, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
No hes not
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 16/6/2026, 13:07:58, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
Fascinated to see how anyone could defend a stooge for whichever dictatorship will fund him.
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 14:07:53, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
She's a stooge for no one
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 16/6/2026, 14:22:48, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
No idea who she is, but George Galloway is.
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 15:01:50, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
No he isn't
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 16/6/2026, 15:50:03, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
This could go on for some time. Yes he is.
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 16:06:56, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Hes not
Hes brilliant . His work in the SA freedom fight is legendary
Re: Galloway
Posted by Maah001 on 16/6/2026, 11:47:55, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
He's a cat
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 8:44:45, in reply to "Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Few lies in there pbh but that's your norm
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 16/6/2026, 18:05:22, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
And which are lies? or are you just going to through around pointless accusations you cant back up as per normal? How about examples of when else I have "lied" here if that is my normal? Just because you tend to have a walter mitty style here, no need to project..
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 19:41:17, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Hic
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 17/6/2026, 7:52:19, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
Which isn’t an answer. So: which bits were lies? Because Galloway did great work in South Africa, but has since become a narcissist on the take: £12,400pcm from Russia Today, plus shows on Sputnik state broadcasting in Russia, leading to him parroting Putin’s views at almost every turn. Galloway also started two Palestinian charities, the funds of which were shown not to have gone anywhere near charitable aid. He was also mates with Saddam Hussein and has started more parties than Oliver Reed. He’s not a principled outsider, he’s a crook.
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 17/6/2026, 11:30:17, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Cobblers
Re: Galloway
Posted by Earls on 17/6/2026, 12:45:00, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
Good to see you’ve got fuck all to offer in response to known facts.
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 17/6/2026, 8:19:06, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
Spot on. And telling he has avoided the questions
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 16/6/2026, 21:01:08, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
An utterly predictable response from you when challenged. You made 2 allegations. You cannot evidence either. "hic" is j in c for "erm i have no answer".
Now to make it easy for you
1)Which part was the lie - list all if relevant with your evidence
2)Show me other times I have lied. You will not be able to .
Bluster you cannot back up. I`d suggest you find evidence next time you make allegations.
(responding "hic" will confirm you are unable to and have made baseless accusations. Still It may get part of the thread deleted and save your blushes yet again)
Your move. Evidence or justification or show you are classless who cant back up allegations. Much like galloway. Your choice. Repeat a response of "hic" will show the latter
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 16/6/2026, 21:42:41, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Double hic
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 16/6/2026, 22:10:03, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
Point proven. Doubly proven in fact
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 17/6/2026, 7:09:54, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Oh no another War n peace chapter
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 17/6/2026, 8:16:10, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
As you cannot prove what your wild accusations or even address them i will accept your apology
Re: Galloway
Posted by J in C on 17/6/2026, 12:33:52, in reply to "Re: Galloway" WUM Extraordinaire
Nothing to prove you are a Tory child starver that says enough about you
Re: Galloway
Posted by Nick NBH on 17/6/2026, 18:16:13, in reply to "Re: Galloway"
You have no idea which way I vote and when.
But yes with allegations you have made you do have to prove them .
I`ll break it down as you are clearly hard of understanding
1)What part of my original post was a lie - actually you used lies plural. So which parts are "lies" and what is the "truth" . Presumably you know to call them lies?
2)Where else do i make a habit of lying?
You will utterly fail to answer either point. Yet again. Because you called out "lies" and have no idea why you did or what they were. This says a lot about you.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
on 15/6/2026, 17:57:08