This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Haks v Naks

    Posted by KennyC on 25/10/2025, 17:58:09

    One has done more whilst only playing 3 minutes this season,

    Whilst the other has been a hinderance being the oppositions best player

    Jack needs some balls and drop the useless prick

      Re: Haks v Naks

      Posted by Nearly a Genius on 25/10/2025, 19:19:34, in reply to "Haks v Naks"
      Legend of Outlaws

      What a load of cobblers.
      Which match were you watching?

        Re: Haks v Naks

        Posted by Hatsworth on 25/10/2025, 18:11:34, in reply to "Haks v Naks"

        What a fcuking awful thing to think, let alone write. The guy has been a perennial sub for a good few years at Bristol city and came here to JOIN US and to play games. He’s clearly rusty and low on confidence - but he’s also a human being. He might be past his best. He may also come good. Point is we don’t know but his pedigree suggests he’s good enough for this level. What I don’t think can be doubted is that he’s trying (for OUR club).

        We’ve won 1-0 away. Those are the sorts of results that we churned out again and again under jones and we loved it.

        Chill out, enjoy the win, celebrate the team (all of the team). If you can’t be happy with a 1-0 win after the run we’ve had perhaps being a hatter isn’t for you.

          Re: Haks v Naks

          Posted by NorthLondonHatter on 25/10/2025, 18:09:22, in reply to "Haks v Naks"

          Jack said after the game Wells did well !

          Nordas will start Tuesday surely - chance to shine.

          Can't believe Yates was over a million, at least Wells was free.

            Re: Haks v Naks

            Posted by Snapper on 25/10/2025, 18:16:12, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

            I thought Wells play was good today. He just cannot buy a goal ATM, we need one to bounce off his backside and go in. If he can turn his goals scoring round he’s a great player for this level

              Re: Haks v Naks

              Posted by bbb on 25/10/2025, 18:22:36, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

              He's really not a 'great' player for this level. For us to be up the top end of the table we need far better than him up top.
              His pathetic put on injury when he skied a shot near the end sums him up.

                Re: Haks v Naks

                Posted by SAHB on 25/10/2025, 19:02:50, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

                I think,like other that he will come good just needs that confidence boost that s goal gives you.
                If you've played you will know he is trying too hard, just needs to relax.
                Today he had the chances and snatched at them.
                I think he is the best of what we have although Yates could still surprise a few.
                Nordas for me is still not at this level.


                The journey leads you to the answers..

                  Re: Haks v Naks

                  Posted by Ninja on 26/10/2025, 6:04:35, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

                  Nordas for me is still not at this level.

                  3m, gulp.

                    Re: Haks v Naks

                    Posted by Ramridge Raider on 25/10/2025, 19:10:42, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

                    Very sensible post.

                      Re: Haks v Naks

                      Posted by bbb on 25/10/2025, 19:10:05, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

                      Yeah, I get that mate and no one could fault the lads workrate today but he's never been a prolific goalscorer. That said, neither Yates or Nordas look.capable of being the answer up top either!

                        Re: Haks v Naks

                        Posted by Father Ted on 25/10/2025, 19:31:20, in reply to "Re: Haks v Naks"

                        It's a cliche, but he looks like he needs one to go in off his arse.
                        I'd play him Tuesday against Brightons kids.

                        Like SAHB says I don't think any of the others would be much better, let's hope Hamadi his the ground running.

            [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

            DISCLAIMER

            The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

            Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

              Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

              What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

            eXTReMe Tracker